This is a very interesting case involving drunk driving where the suspect was driving recklessly after he was seen drinking at a local bar. He tragically killed a family of three but the defense claims they can prove that he was not legally drunk. It was a "hit and run" so he wasn't tested immediately after the accident. It took four months for authorities to find him. The defense is going to base their case on the fact that he didn't consume sufficient alcohol to be legally drunk and therefore their charge of second degree murder won't stand. I think he'll do some serious hard time. What do you think?
This is a good case to re-visit. It does have some parallels to the novel "Bridge Over the Valley."
Read the entire article by clicking on the interactive title.
No comments:
Post a Comment